Daily Tech News, Interviews, Reviews and Updates

Vivo X Fold 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4: A Spec Comparison

This article will compare two foldable devices from Vivo and Samsung. Let’s compare the Vivo X Fold 2 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 devices and find the best foldable device among them.

Vivo X Fold 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4

General

Release Date Expected – 28 April 2023 25 August 2022
Dimensions 161.3 x 143.4 x 6 mm

Folded – 161.3 x 73.4 x 12.9 mm

155.1 x 130.1 x 6.3 mm

Folded – 155.1 x 67.1 x 14.2-15.8 mm

Weight 279 gm 263 gm

Connectivity

Network Connectivity 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G
Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7 with Triple Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e with Dual Band Support and Wi-Fi Direct
Bluetooth Version 5.3 Version 5.2

Processor

Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) Chipset
Primary Clock Speed 3.2 GHz 3.19 GHz
Operating System Android 13 based Origin OS 3 Android 12L( which can now be upgraded to Android 13) based One UI 5.1
GPU Adreno 740 Adreno 730

Storage

RAM Options 12GB 12GB
Internal Storage Options 256GB and 512GB 256GB, 512GB and 1TB

Display

Display Type Foldable LTPO4 AMOLED Display

Cover Display – AMOLED Display

Foldable Dynamic AMOLED 2X Display

Cover Display – Dynamic AMOLED 2X Display

Screen Size 8.03”

Cover Display – 6.53”

7.6”

Cover Display – 6.2”

Screen Resolution 1916 x 2160 pixels

Cover Display – 1080 x 2520 pixels

1812 x 2176 pixels

Cover Display – 904 x 2316 pixels

Refresh Rate 120Hz 120Hz

Camera

Rear Camera 50MP + 12MP + 12MP Triple Camera Setup 50MP + 10MP + 12MP Triple Camera Setup
Front Camera 16MP

Cover Camera – 16MP

4MP

Cover Camera – 10MP

Sensors

Fingerprint Sensor Yes, Dual Screen, Under Display, Optical Fingerprint Sensor Yes, Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor
Accelerometer Yes Yes
Proximity Sensor Yes Yes
Gyroscope Yes Yes
Barometer Yes Yes
Compass Yes Yes
Ultra Wideband Support No Yes

Battery

Battery Capacity 4800 mAh 4400 mAh
Fast Charge 120W Wired Fast Charging

50W Wireless Fast Charging

10W Reverse Wireless Charging

25W Wired Fast Charging

15W Wireless Fast Charging

4.5W Reverse Wireless Charging

Colour

Colour Variants Black, Blue and Red Graygreen, Phantom Black, Beige and Burgundy
Buy on Amazon N/A

Comparing the specs of the two devices, it has turned out that the newly launched Vivo X Fold 2, is better than Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 4.

The Vivo X Fold 2 comes equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset and offers a slightly better performance than the Galaxy Z Fold 4 powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset. The device also has the Adreno 740 GPU while the Samsung device is equipped with the previous Adreno 730 GPU.

Coming to the display of the two devices, the Vivo X Fold 2 offers better inner display and cover displays which have larger screen sizes and higher screen resolutions than the Galaxy foldable device. The Vivo X Fold has an inner display with a screen size of 8.03″ and a 6.53″ cover display with screen resolutions of 1916 x 2160 pixels and 1080 x 2520, respectively.

Regarding its cameras, both the devices offer a 50MP triple camera setup at its rear with the same 12MP ultra-wide camera, however, when it comes to the telephoto cameras, the Vivo X Fold 2 has a 12MP camera while Samsung’s foldable device offers only a 10MP telephoto camera. The Vivo X Fold 2 also offers better selfie cameras on its inner and cover displays as well. The device offers 16MP cameras each but the Galaxy Z Fold 4 only has a 4MP inner selfie camera and a 10MP camera on its cover display.

Even for the battery backups too, the Vivo X Fold 2 offers a better battery backup with a battery capacity of 4800 mAh while the Galaxy Z Fold 4 comes equipped with a 4400 mAh battery. The Vivo X Fold 2 also supports better wired and wireless fast charge features and a faster reverse wireless charging feature.

So in all major aspects, the latest Vivo X Fold 4 is better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4, making it the best foldable device in this comparison.



Readers like you help support The Tech Outlook. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. We cannot guarantee the Product information shown is 100% accurate and we advise you to check the product listing on the original manufacturer website. Thetechoutlook is not responsible for price changes carried out by retailers. The discounted price or deal mentioned in this item was available at the time of writing and may be subject to time restrictions and/or limited unit availability. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates Read More
You might also like

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More