For google, its user data is more important than the gadget itself

The Pixelbook, Pixel phones, and even Chromebooks are proof that Google makes the hardware, but it isn’t true at the core of the company’s broader business model. As a result, Google’s software is working brilliantly even as other hardware manufacturers work diligently to design and promote their products, which are supported by Google software. For Google, user data is more vital than gadgets.

However, Google should not worry about that. They also bear the risk of manufacturing things that may or may not find a market. Google is experimenting with its software by making hardware, and perhaps even guiding manufacturers in the right direction. Then Google sits down and collects user data that travels through its software on devices created by other companies, such as computers, phones, and more. A good example is Android Central.

Take the case of the Pixelbook as an illustration. The call was simply cut off by Google! Supporters of the product were quite dissatisfied, but everything made sense to Google. After showing other companies the potential of the product, Google withdrew and other laptop-producing companies took over.

In this regard, Google resembles Microsoft more so than Apple because the former makes products while also creating software specifically for them, and the latter does both. Despite the fact that both Google and Microsoft produce products, as was already noted, their goals are very dissimilar. To the best of its ability, Google creates tools to test and develop its software. According to Android Central, Google tests out “particular hardware configurations” using these components to enhance its other businesses. Consequently, Google produces a wide range of goods, such as cameras, wifi routers, and more.

In the end, even when it could be losing money on these physical devices, there is always a desire to capture more and more customer data. Additionally, Google actually makes money off of user data.
In actuality, everyone involved—from the businesses to the consumers themselves—wins as long as they don’t feel as though their privacy is being violated.

Additionally, this approach will probably be used by the Pixel Watch as well. Google is likely to stand out if the goal is accomplished and other smartwatch manufacturers start making comparable goods. and if the product is a failure, production simply ceases.




Readers like you help support The Tech Outlook. When you make a purchase using links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. We cannot guarantee the Product information shown is 100% accurate and we advise you to check the product listing on the original manufacturer website. Thetechoutlook is not responsible for price changes carried out by retailers. The discounted price or deal mentioned in this item was available at the time of writing and may be subject to time restrictions and/or limited unit availability. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates Read More

Advertisement

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More